(arstechnica.com)

425 points nixass | 1 comments | 02 Apr 21 18:00 UTC | HN request time: 1.566s | source

Show context

de6u99er ◴[02 Apr 21 20:20 UTC] No.26675527[source]▶

I'd argue it epends on how you define clean energy, because nuclear waste is still an unsolved oroblem and a ticking timebomb.

Typing this on my phone while watching Godzilla vs. Kong ;)

replies(1): >>26676617 #

1. effie ◴[02 Apr 21 22:26 UTC] No.26676617[source]▶

> nuclear waste is still an unsolved oroblem and a ticking timebomb.

This is nonsense. Yes nuclear waste from power plants has its specifics, but we know what to do with it since 40's. There is no real problem with it.

Nuclear should be considered part of clean energy standard, White House says