(arstechnica.com)

425 points nixass | 2 comments | 02 Apr 21 18:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.647s | source

1. lampe3 ◴[02 Apr 21 20:32 UTC] No.26675660[source]▶

we need to think how to warn our successors that this place they are entering is deadly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-time_nuclear_waste_warnin... or google: Nuclear semiotics

replies(1): >>26676631 #

2. effie ◴[02 Apr 21 22:29 UTC] No.26676631[source]▶

No, that is a completely artificial academic problem.

Nuclear should be considered part of clean energy standard, White House says