(arstechnica.com)

425 points nixass | 1 comments | 02 Apr 21 18:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.382s | source

Show context

einrealist[dead post] ◴[02 Apr 21 18:30 UTC] No.26674327[source]▶

Yeah, and lets just ignore the waste and emissions that it generates at all other fronts (building the plant and materials for it, mining and processing of the fuel, processing and storage of spend fuel, disassembly of the plant). "_Clean_" nuclear energy is and will always be a fairy tale!

Edit: Emphasized the word "Clean". I am not per se against Nuclear. Anyway, keep downvoting my opinion.

1. 11thEarlOfMar ◴[02 Apr 21 19:25 UTC] No.26675031[source]▶

>>26674327 #

I upvoted because a lot of people feel the way you do and those of us with pro-nuclear views should practice making our case constructively.

And because I don't like my contrarian views to be silenced, either.

↑

Nuclear should be considered part of clean energy standard, White House says