←back to thread

604 points wyldfire | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.27s | source
Show context
dleslie ◴[] No.26344736[source]
This captures my feelings on the issue:

> That framing is based on a false premise that we have to choose between “old tracking” and “new tracking.” It’s not either-or. Instead of re-inventing the tracking wheel, we should imagine a better world without the myriad problems of targeted ads.

I don't want to be tracked. I never have wanted to be tracked. I shouldn't have to aggressively opt-out of tracking; it should be a service one must opt-in to receive. And it's not something we can trust industry to correct properly. This is precisely the role that privacy-protecting legislation should be undertaking.

Stop spying on us, please.

replies(10): >>26345317 #>>26345398 #>>26345438 #>>26345507 #>>26345714 #>>26346976 #>>26347529 #>>26347549 #>>26349806 #>>26350238 #
evrydayhustling ◴[] No.26345507[source]
It seems like FLoC could make it easier to opt out centrally rather than going through a mess of specific (dis)approvals for the specific trackers on every site. Maybe it could even be a good place for a dial - "I'll expose a 4-bit cohort, but nothing more specific."

It also seems like FLoC could make it more politically viable to crack down non-consensual tracking. Publishers wouldn't be able to say "we have no choice but to deal with this [third party tracker] scum" but could continue to gate content by subscription or (consensual) FLoC as necessary for their business model.

Pushing publishing and advertising towards proactive consent about targeting puts them into a dialog with the market about what's ok, instead of letting them hide behind a bunch of shifting tracker businesses.

replies(6): >>26345563 #>>26346014 #>>26348043 #>>26348349 #>>26349630 #>>26349899 #
contravariant ◴[] No.26348349[source]
Eh opting out of cookies is pretty easy, and opting out of any background fingerprinting is impossible in either scenario.
replies(2): >>26349374 #>>26349392 #
fckthisguy ◴[] No.26349374[source]
Opting out of cookies is often not very easy because of:

- hidden and confusingly worded opt-out dialogues - different cookie banners on ever site - dark patterns such as requiring far more clicks to opt-out than in - opt-out dialogues with lots of technical wording - sites that just don't provide opt-out options - sites that purposely degrade the ux if you opt-out

All these mean that the average "not technical" user (such as my parents) cannot reliability opt-out.

We ought to have opt-in be the default.

replies(2): >>26349770 #>>26350600 #
1. contravariant ◴[] No.26349770[source]
Ah I see the confusion.

No I meant it's easy to just not send those cookies back.

At the very least it is not harder than letting the browser profile you and choose what it should and shouldn't share with advertisers.