←back to thread

140 points 7d7n | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.223s | source
Show context
pratik661 ◴[] No.26182359[source]
I grew up in metro Atlanta and studied at Georgia Tech. The state government subsidizes college education for grads with a certain GPA (HOPE Scholarship). However, I (and most CS grads I knew) left Atlanta for better paying jobs in NYC/Bay Area/Seattle/Austin. I always wondered why the ATL tech scene was 'underdeveloped' compared to comparable sized cities like Seattle and Austin, despite having major research institutions (Georgia Tech and Emory) to anchor it.

This is what I mean by 'underdeveloped':

- Most software dev job postings (as of May 2018) have SPECIFIC tech stack requirements. This to me is a red flag. Most recruiters in 'developed' tech cities assume that software development skills are transferable and that technology stacks/frameworks/languages can be learned.

- The salaries offered were still very low compared to comparable COL locations like Austin

- No major FAANG presence to put upward pressure on local developer wages

replies(14): >>26182424 #>>26182453 #>>26182607 #>>26182952 #>>26183122 #>>26183172 #>>26183431 #>>26185995 #>>26186002 #>>26186101 #>>26186104 #>>26186504 #>>26188019 #>>26188376 #
the_only_law ◴[] No.26183431[source]
I grew up in the very outer burbs of the Atlanta metro and have kinda been stuck bouncing around the south ever since.

Currently I’m in Florida and I’ve been similarly confused by how underdeveloped tech feels here. I mean this is one of the biggest states with several metropolitan areas and a large economic base, but frankly most of what I’ve seen as far as tech jobs seems mostly underwhelming.

replies(1): >>26188047 #
technick ◴[] No.26188047[source]
Miami is going to blow up soon. A lot of talent is leaving Silicon Valley for Miami. The weather is great year around, cheap taxes, less restrictive government and cheaper real estate.
replies(2): >>26188180 #>>26188939 #
BurritoAlPastor ◴[] No.26188180[source]
Isn’t Miami going to be underwater in a few decades?
replies(1): >>26190083 #
1. ◴[] No.26190083[source]