←back to thread

851 points swyx | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.404s | source
Show context
extrememacaroni ◴[] No.25826762[source]
This reminds me of an idea I had days ago of using an AI to tell poisonous mushrooms from edible ones apart, from photos.

Then I realized I don't want to be responsible for anyone's death.

replies(6): >>25826840 #>>25826937 #>>25826951 #>>25826971 #>>25827058 #>>25827067 #
1. syntaxing ◴[] No.25826840[source]
What if you limited the range from I don’t know if it’s poisonous to X% likely poisonous vs is/is not poisonous?
replies(2): >>25826887 #>>25827174 #
2. eropple ◴[] No.25826887[source]
People empirically do not understand probability in a useful way. Folks will, in aggregate, read that as "X% poisonous", not "X% chance to be kill you."

"Oh, that's only 25%, it'll be fiiine."

3. byecomputer ◴[] No.25827174[source]
Even if you can avoid being liable for it, I'd think most people wouldn't want someone's death hanging over their head for reasons beyond the legal.