←back to thread

Pixar's Render Farm

(twitter.com)
382 points brundolf | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hadrien01 ◴[] No.25616026[source]
For those that can't stand Twitter's UI: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1345146328058269696.html
replies(7): >>25616111 #>>25616482 #>>25616748 #>>25617285 #>>25617838 #>>25618314 #>>25618916 #
happytoexplain ◴[] No.25616111[source]
Thank you. All I saw was a post with zero context, followed by a reply, followed by another reply using a different reply delineator (a horizontal break instead of a vertical line??), followed by nothing. It just ends. It's hard to believe this is real and intended.
replies(3): >>25616374 #>>25616499 #>>25618244 #
naikrovek ◴[] No.25616499[source]
It's amazing to me that people find twitter difficult to read... I mean it's not perfect but it's not an ovaltine decoder ring, either.

Just ... Scroll ... Down ... Click where it says "read more" or "show more replies"

You're human; THE most adaptable creature known. Adapt!

I'm not saying that twitter UX is perfect, or even good. I AM saying that it is usable.

replies(5): >>25616543 #>>25616610 #>>25616612 #>>25618116 #>>25618619 #
xtracto ◴[] No.25616612[source]
Twitter was designed to have 280 characters max per message. This means that for this kind of long format text, the amount of Signal-to-Noise ratio of having a large number of "tweets" is pretty low.

The amount of stuff your brain has to filter in the form of user name, user tweet handle, additional tagged handlers, UI menus, UI buttons for replying, retweeting, liking, etc on every single code snippet makes your brain work way more than it should to read a page of text.

Just imagine if I had written this exact text in 3 separate HackerNews comments, and prepended each with a 1/ 2/ 3/ text, in addition to all the message UI, it would have been more difficult to read than a simple piece of text.

replies(2): >>25616636 #>>25616768 #
naikrovek ◴[] No.25616636[source]
You all are perfect delicate flowers that need things to be just right in order to use them, then? Is that what you're saying?

Because that's what I'm getting from you.

replies(4): >>25616892 #>>25616907 #>>25617147 #>>25618104 #
turminal ◴[] No.25616907[source]
I for one am saying Twitter has many, many people working on UX and the web interface is still terrible. Hardly any interface made for such a broad spectrum of people gets it just right for all its users, but Twitter is doing an exceptionally bad job at it.
replies(1): >>25618182 #
naikrovek ◴[] No.25618182{3}[source]
I don't think you (or anyone else on this website) understand the scale at which twitter operates. Including all replies to a thread by default on a site with that amount of traffic will increase the load of ... everything. Dramatically.

Yes, their UI sucks. No, they haven't fixed it. I would not be surprised at all if that were due to necessity rather than incompetence. Even tiny changes at that scale make large differences.

And, honestly I would not be surprised if it were incompetence, either. The skill of the silicon valley developer (as demonstrated by the commenters here) does not impress me even a little.

replies(3): >>25618338 #>>25618640 #>>25618661 #
1. kortilla ◴[] No.25618640{4}[source]
> I don't think you (or anyone else on this website) understand the scale at which twitter operates.

This website is full of employees (and ex employees) of Google, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Twitter, and any other company that has done stuff at global scale.

Scaling provides constraints, we all understand that. The interface being completely miserable to use is not because of that constraint.