←back to thread

Pixar's Render Farm

(twitter.com)
382 points brundolf | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
supernova87a ◴[] No.25616522[source]
I would love to know about some curious questions, for example:

If there's a generally static scene with just characters walking through it, does the render take advantage of rendering the static parts for the whole scene once, and then overlay and recompute the small differences caused by the moving things in each individual sub frame?

Or, alternatively what "class" of optimizations does something like that fall into?

Is rendering of video games more similar to rendering for movies, or for VFX?

What are some of physics "cheats" that look good enough but massively reduce compute intensity?

What are some interesting scaling laws about compute intensity / time versus parameters that the film director may have to choose between? "Director X, you can have <x> but that means to fit in the budget, we can't do <y>"

Can anyone point to a nice introduction to some of the basic compute-relevant techniques that rendering uses? Thanks!

replies(5): >>25616535 #>>25616590 #>>25616686 #>>25617013 #>>25618032 #
dagmx ◴[] No.25616590[source]
If you're interested in production rendering for films, there's a great deep dive into all the major studio renderers https://dl.acm.org/toc/tog/2018/37/3

As for your questions:

> Is rendering of video games more similar to rendering for movies, or VFX?

This question is possibly based on an incorrect assumption that feature (animated) films are rendered differently than VFX. They're identical in terms of most tech stacks including rendering and the process is largely similar overall.

Games aren't really similar to either since they're raster based rather than pathtraced. The new RTX setups are bringing those worlds closer. However older rendering setups like REYES that Pixar used up until Finding Dory, are more similar to games raster pipelines. though that's trivializing the differences.

A good intro to rendering is reading Raytracing in a Weekend (https://raytracing.github.io/books/RayTracingInOneWeekend.ht...), and Matt Pharr's PBRT book (http://www.pbr-book.org/)

replies(2): >>25616622 #>>25617396 #
supernova87a ◴[] No.25616622[source]
Thanks!

(I was also reading the OP which says "...Our world works quite a bit differently than VFX in two ways..." hence my curiosity)

replies(2): >>25616698 #>>25616726 #
1. dagmx ◴[] No.25616726[source]
I suspect they mean more in approaches to renderfarm utilization and core stealing.

A lot of VFX studios use off the shelf farm management solutions that package up a job as a whole to a node.

I don't believe core stealing like they describe is unique to Pixar, but is also not common outside Pixar either, which is what they allude to afaik. It's less an animation vs VFX comparison, as just studio vs studio infrastructure comparison.