←back to thread

946 points giuliomagnifico | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
floatingatoll ◴[] No.25606311[source]
I couldn’t have guessed the purpose of the app from this name, and now that I know what it does, I would specifically avoid giving money to it due the name alone.

I’m glad someone made an alternative to Caffeine.app but “they’re both drugs” doesn’t weaken my personal objection to the choice of name. I am glad that Apple is compelling the name to be changed, and I hope the author complies. This is where “universal freedom” clashes directly with “common sense for a department store” for me, and while I understand others aren’t on my side, I prefer department stores to flea markets.

replies(2): >>25606517 #>>25606552 #
jjcon ◴[] No.25606552[source]
As someone I guess not in the loop with the latest in outrage culture... what exactly is offensive about the name?
replies(1): >>25607133 #
floatingatoll ◴[] No.25607133[source]
My issues with it stem from something unpublished in the late 90s, which is not something 'dismissable' that you can simply set aside using the negation-by-framing of 'outrage culture', so I can't offer any reply to your question. Please accept my apologies for how far off the mark my reasons are from your assumptions; perhaps another time we'll be better aligned.
replies(2): >>25607606 #>>25607851 #
ubercow13 ◴[] No.25607606[source]
On the contrary, intentionally obtuse and unsubstantive references to some unpublished something-or-other, and unspecified personal objections which are claimed to be 'common sense', are pretty vapid and dismissable.
replies(1): >>25609018 #
1. floatingatoll ◴[] No.25609018{3}[source]
Noted, thanks!