←back to thread

946 points giuliomagnifico | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.952s | source | bottom
Show context
paozac ◴[] No.25605970[source]
That's very silly. The times are ready for a new job title: software product namer, to make sure a name won't offend anyone or violate trademarks and store guidelines.
replies(3): >>25606097 #>>25606124 #>>25606331 #
1. mhh__ ◴[] No.25606124[source]
Honestly the real enemy (if people are genuinely offended I tend to side with them) is people being offended on behalf of other people.
replies(4): >>25606181 #>>25606244 #>>25606395 #>>25606651 #
2. rxhernandez ◴[] No.25606181[source]
This kind of crap has been around long before people started caring about how marginalized people feel. Look no further than obscenity laws which have been in place a lot longer than this wave of empathy.
3. happytoexplain ◴[] No.25606244[source]
In most cases where a group-defining parameter is simple, it's best to avoid classifying them as "the enemy".
4. DoofusOfDeath ◴[] No.25606395[source]
It may be a little nastier than that.

In some cases, they're selective about which groups will and will not be sheltered from offense. And they may refuse to admit that, let alone engage in a public, civil debate about their choices.

5. pydry ◴[] No.25606651[source]
You're assuming that this is actually the reason. It smells to me like the real reason they kicked it off the platform has fuck all to do with the name, but feigning "wokeness" serves as a decent cover for a variety of evils.
replies(1): >>25606894 #
6. Swenrekcah ◴[] No.25606894[source]
Not advocating drug use has exactly nothing to do with wokeness.