←back to thread

830 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.217s | source
Show context
AriaMinaei ◴[] No.25135668[source]
Classic antitrust maneuver; divide and conquer, this time from Apple. Antitrust activists shouldn't let this dull their pencil.

The main issue is not the exorbitant commission rate. Apple is hurting the consumers via its anti-competitive behavior with regards to what apps people are and are not allowed to install on a device that they've paid for. They are blocking value creation up and down the stack in a manner that "if we can't extract it, you're not allowed to create it."

replies(3): >>25136053 #>>25136627 #>>25142618 #
kqvamxurcagg ◴[] No.25136053[source]
I have to agree you.

It's intolerable that Apple has been allowed to lockdown their device for 10 years, completely control the market for apps and when it looks like regulators will take action they reduce their price and claim to be acting in the interest of small business.

Third party app stores must be allowed. Apple should not be allowed to dictate what software I can and cannot have on my device.

replies(3): >>25137040 #>>25137673 #>>25139611 #
graeme ◴[] No.25137040[source]
Why not get another device? Third party app stores break the security model for regular users.

Smartphones have seen explosive growth because normal people can use them safely.

replies(3): >>25137238 #>>25137392 #>>25142754 #
1. satya71 ◴[] No.25137392[source]
I don't think it breaks the security model. There could be a strict but fair standard for qualifying as an app store. Then I could choose an app store that imposes an even stricter security/privacy model.