←back to thread

830 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.593s | source
Show context
gtsteve ◴[] No.25135526[source]
Looks nice but it doesn't solve my fundamental problem:

1. I invest loads of time and effort developing an app

2. Apple rejects it

-or-

2. Apple approves it

3. I ship a new update

4. Apple rejects the update and now decides my app should have been rejected retroactively.

I'm especially concerned about what happened to Hey and others but my customers are demanding smartphone apps and there are still limits to what can be done with a mobile web browser.

replies(11): >>25135538 #>>25135628 #>>25135644 #>>25135672 #>>25135968 #>>25135975 #>>25136030 #>>25136106 #>>25136507 #>>25137973 #>>25139367 #
andysinclair ◴[] No.25135644[source]
This is not aimed at solving your problem, this is aimed at helping us small developers build a more sustainable business on the App Store.

We will ultimately build more apps and invest more time in supporting and improving our current apps.

replies(3): >>25135706 #>>25135895 #>>25136037 #
madeofpalk ◴[] No.25135706[source]
> this is aimed at helping us small developers

I doubt this was the aim. It suspect its aim was to fend off all this scrutiny on their App Store business.

Who knows whether it'll work in avoiding attention from law makers and regulators, but this will do nothing to address the developer's concerns and problem with the App Store.

replies(3): >>25135890 #>>25135963 #>>25136265 #
1. bottled_poe ◴[] No.25136265[source]
The cynic in me agrees. Perhaps Apple sees the writing on the wall and they can either make the change with good press or bad.
replies(1): >>25139606 #
2. madeofpalk ◴[] No.25139606[source]
I don't think its cynical to believe this.