←back to thread

830 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.416s | source
Show context
jakozaur ◴[] No.25135512[source]
Great move!

30% is a case for antitrust given how big Apple App Store today is. 15% seems reasonable, 10% would be ideal.

Though it should be 15% for everybody, no artificial caps. Moreover, I believe once you become a platform there should be an independent nano-courthouse where you can appeal.

Today being rejected by Apple, Amazon, or Google platform is equivalent to the economical death penalty for many individuals.

It should be possible to pay $100 by individuals and appeal to an independent nano-courthouse if the original platform rejects or blocks you. If you win, the appeal fee is refunded and the platform has to cover the cost. If you lose, your $100 is gone.

Fee could be adjusted to your earnings, but basic mechanism should stay the same.

replies(5): >>25135617 #>>25135832 #>>25135840 #>>25135850 #>>25136352 #
varispeed ◴[] No.25135617[source]
15% is almost like state level tax. They shouldn't ask more than 5% or they should take payment per app review and take no sales commission. The app store is what makes their iPhones useful, so in my view they should be paying developers to make apps not the other way around.
replies(1): >>25135738 #
singemonkey ◴[] No.25135738[source]
Tone can be hard to judge, so you should append the /s tag to make it clear you're joking, otherwise people are going to assume you mean it.
replies(2): >>25135748 #>>25136607 #
varispeed ◴[] No.25135748[source]
What makes you think it is a joke? Happy to hear why you think 15% is reasonable.
replies(2): >>25135930 #>>25136026 #
1. singemonkey ◴[] No.25136026[source]
Oh wow, my bad, I honestly thought you were joking.

You may need to rethink your arguments as I found them indistinguishable from parody!!

replies(1): >>25136298 #
2. ◴[] No.25136298[source]