If I understand correctly though, since it's a hard cutoff it creates this gap between 1m and ~1.2m where you're actually worse off by making more money pre-tax.
999k --[-15%]--> 849k
1000k --[-30%]--> 700k
1213k --[-30%]--> 849k
If I understand correctly though, since it's a hard cutoff it creates this gap between 1m and ~1.2m where you're actually worse off by making more money pre-tax.
999k --[-15%]--> 849k
1000k --[-30%]--> 700k
1213k --[-30%]--> 849k
Year 1: 999k --[-15%]--> 849k (This year doesn't trip the "limit"
Year 2: 1000k --[-15%]-->850k (Limit is tripped, next year is 30%)
Year 3: 999k --[-30%]-->699k (Fell below the limit, next year is 15% again)
Basically if you are close to the limit at the end of the year, you should immediately stop all advertising/marketing spend to ensure you don't go over the peak :)
I'm not really sure why they did it this way as it really screws over people that are just at the 1m/yr mark, vs a progressive system that would "just work."
Or, they could've just picked $1 million because it's a nice round number and looks good in a press release.