←back to thread

macOS unable to open any non-Apple application

(twitter.com)
2603 points mattsolle | 1 comments | 12 Nov 20 21:00 UTC | HN request time: 1.731s | source
Show context
submeta ◴[12 Nov 20 21:15 UTC] No.25075156[source]▶
Unbelievable. When I read the tweet (tried to post here as well), I suddenly realized why my Mac was unresponsive an hour ago.

Here is another tweet that describes the problem in more detail:

https://mobile.twitter.com/llanga/status/1326989724704268289

> I am currently unable to work because macOS sends hashes of every opened executable to some server of theirs and when `trustd` and `syspolicyd` are unable to do so, the entire operating system grinds to a halt.

EDIT:

As others pointed out, I put this to my `/etc/hosts` file and refreshed it like so:

    sudo emacs /etc/hosts # add `0.0.0.0 ocsp.apple.com` 
    sudo dscacheutil -flushcache; sudo killall -HUP mDNSResponder # refresh hosts
replies(26): >>25075338 #>>25075481 #>>25075547 #>>25075666 #>>25075887 #>>25076053 #>>25076387 #>>25076568 #>>25076811 #>>25077902 #>>25077923 #>>25077940 #>>25079234 #>>25079856 #>>25079879 #>>25080093 #>>25080357 #>>25080370 #>>25080849 #>>25081772 #>>25081989 #>>25083938 #>>25087820 #>>25090415 #>>25090991 #>>25095226 #
vsskanth ◴[12 Nov 20 21:30 UTC] No.25075338[source]▶
Can apple not use security certificates to verify publishers ? why does it need to go to their servers ?
replies(4): >>25075370 #>>25075733 #>>25076033 #>>25078236 #
loeg ◴[12 Nov 20 22:04 UTC] No.25075733[source]▶
The URL mentioned in sibling comments suggests this has to do with certificate revocation (OCSP): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Certificate_Status_Prot...

I agree that breaking system availability when an OCSP server isn't available is user-hostile and unnecessary.

replies(6): >>25075811 #>>25075817 #>>25076021 #>>25076039 #>>25076087 #>>25076418 #
freeone3000 ◴[12 Nov 20 22:09 UTC] No.25075811[source]▶
The alternative is OCSP being allowed if internet isn't available, which is a security risk for reasonable defense-in-depth strategies.
replies(2): >>25075905 #>>25075987 #
gruez ◴[12 Nov 20 22:15 UTC] No.25075905[source]▶
Most OSCP implementations fail-open, not fail-closed. I get the benefits of having it fail-closed, but it should be opt in, because having an always-online requirement for using a mac is ridiculous.
replies(2): >>25075954 #>>25076455 #
1. jrochkind1 ◴[12 Nov 20 23:02 UTC] No.25076455[source]▶
The OP literally says if you disallow connection or unplug the intenret it does fail open.

I think it's probably an unintended bug that this failure mode was fail-closed.

The costs of this unintended bug are going to be huge to Apple's reputation, as demonstrated in this whole HN thread, where many assuming what's going on is even WORSE than it really is.

(Personally I think having signed certs (with opt-in ability to run unsigned apps, as MacOS has) is fine. And fail-open OSCP revocation check is also fine-ish, although it would annoy me if it's making it slower to launch apps on the regular. The problem here is a bug, not one of design. But most of this thread is assuming Apple was doing something different than this. Of course, how often a company produces fairly catastrophic bugs is also on them).