←back to thread

Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end 16-inch MacBook Pro

(www.macrumors.com)
1080 points antipaul | 1 comments | 12 Nov 20 00:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
maz1b ◴[12 Nov 20 02:16 UTC] No.25065664[source]▶
This is pretty crazy to see, even if the full story isn't clear yet. A base level MacBook Air is taking the crown of the best MacBook Pro. Wow. SVP Johny Srouji and all of the Apple hardware + silicon team have been smashing it for the past many years.

For what it's worth, I have a fully specced out 16 inch MacBook Pro with the AMD Radeon Pro 5600m and even with that I'm regularly hitting 100% usage of the card, and not to mention the fan noise.

Looking forward to a version from Apple that is made for actual professionals, but I imagine these introductory M1 based devices are going to be great for the vast majority of people.

replies(6): >>25065838 #>>25066040 #>>25066161 #>>25066381 #>>25067539 #>>25074822 #
Bud ◴[12 Nov 20 03:40 UTC] No.25066161[source]▶
It's not just outperforming the MacBook Pro. It's also blowing away the current 2020 top-end iMac, which has a 10-core Intel i9.

And it's doing this while using more than an order of magnitude less power (10W vs. a TDP of 125W for that Intel part).

That's stunning.

replies(6): >>25066209 #>>25066399 #>>25066461 #>>25067298 #>>25067868 #>>25067990 #
jeswin ◴[12 Nov 20 04:30 UTC] No.25066461[source]▶
> And it's doing this while using more than an order of magnitude less power (10W vs. a TDP of 125W for that Intel part).

That's the wrong conclusion to make. For instance, the Lenovo ThinkBook 14s (with a Ryzen 4800u) with a 15W TDP posts the same Geekbench multicore scores [1] as the M1 Macbook. But the ThinkBook isn't in any way faster than the top-end iMac for real world compute intensive tasks.

The M1 certainly looks efficient, but there's little you can conclude from a single benchmark running for a very short period of time.

[1]: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/4642736

replies(2): >>25066662 #>>25068299 #
timpattinson ◴[12 Nov 20 10:05 UTC] No.25068299[source]▶
Maybe Geekbench is kinda useless as a benchmark suite then? I only see it used by Mac fans.
replies(2): >>25068330 #>>25068656 #
1. wffurr ◴[12 Nov 20 11:16 UTC] No.25068656[source]▶
It's not measuring sustained performance. The fanless MacBook Air is going to throttle much sooner than a desktop iMac with proper cooling and unlimited power.