←back to thread

1080 points antipaul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
cactus2093 ◴[] No.25065963[source]
This idea of “actual professionals” that always comes up in response to apple’s “Pro” moniker amuses me to no end.

Everybody throws the term around and no two people have the same definition! What in the world is an actual professional? There are professional journalists that just need a browser and text editor. There are professional programmers working on huge code bases in compiled languages that do need a beefy machine, and there are professional programmers that just need a dumb terminal to ssh into a dev machine in the cloud.

And then of course what the largest subset of people seem to mean is professional video editors or content creators. What percent of the working population are video editors? Some tiny fraction, how did that become the default type of professional in the context of talking about computers?

And then a lot of things that people also complain about like how replacing the wider variety of ports with usb c or thunderbolt is contradictory on a “professional” machine also don’t really make sense. Professionals can use dongles like anyone else. In fact many professionals will have more specific needs that require a single a way, for instance having a builtin sd card reader doesn’t help a professional photographer using cfexpress cards.

replies(20): >>25066164 #>>25066195 #>>25066208 #>>25066231 #>>25066273 #>>25066279 #>>25066291 #>>25066365 #>>25066382 #>>25066396 #>>25066404 #>>25066418 #>>25066480 #>>25066496 #>>25066648 #>>25066850 #>>25067122 #>>25067149 #>>25067290 #>>25067345 #
p1necone ◴[] No.25067122[source]
> What percent of the working population are video editors?

Most of the working population could get away with using basically any computer - if you're marketing a computer as 'Pro' you're talking to a specific subset of that. (Or you're just banking on it working as aspirational marketing and don't actually care about professionals)

replies(2): >>25067276 #>>25067281 #
EugeneOZ ◴[] No.25067281[source]
”Pro” doesn't implicitly mean ”Pro Video Editor”.
replies(1): >>25067310 #
1. p1necone ◴[] No.25067310[source]
I wasn't specifically referring to video editors (although the comment I replied to was), just anyone that needs/benefits from more powerful hardware to do their job.

I was just calling out the idea that professionals being a small portion of literally everyone is a useful argument to make. How many markets aren't?