←back to thread

1080 points antipaul | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.413s | source
Show context
cactus2093 ◴[] No.25065963[source]
This idea of “actual professionals” that always comes up in response to apple’s “Pro” moniker amuses me to no end.

Everybody throws the term around and no two people have the same definition! What in the world is an actual professional? There are professional journalists that just need a browser and text editor. There are professional programmers working on huge code bases in compiled languages that do need a beefy machine, and there are professional programmers that just need a dumb terminal to ssh into a dev machine in the cloud.

And then of course what the largest subset of people seem to mean is professional video editors or content creators. What percent of the working population are video editors? Some tiny fraction, how did that become the default type of professional in the context of talking about computers?

And then a lot of things that people also complain about like how replacing the wider variety of ports with usb c or thunderbolt is contradictory on a “professional” machine also don’t really make sense. Professionals can use dongles like anyone else. In fact many professionals will have more specific needs that require a single a way, for instance having a builtin sd card reader doesn’t help a professional photographer using cfexpress cards.

replies(20): >>25066164 #>>25066195 #>>25066208 #>>25066231 #>>25066273 #>>25066279 #>>25066291 #>>25066365 #>>25066382 #>>25066396 #>>25066404 #>>25066418 #>>25066480 #>>25066496 #>>25066648 #>>25066850 #>>25067122 #>>25067149 #>>25067290 #>>25067345 #
jrobn ◴[] No.25066480[source]
YouTube has grown by triple digits. Those video “content creators”, from those just messing around to the professional film makers, are a huge opportunity for Apple to secure mind share in. Billions of views on YouTube. Billions of videos too.

I suspect the M1 powered Macs will be hugely successful and very useful for multiple types of users.

replies(1): >>25067111 #
p1necone ◴[] No.25067111[source]
I don't see these being very useful for video editing with RAM maxing out at 16gb. Maybe 1080p, but not 4k.

(And the small storage, but that can be remedied with a NAS or other external storage, and then fast local scratch space only needs to be big enough for a couple of projects at a time)

replies(2): >>25067260 #>>25067299 #
1. kayoone ◴[] No.25067299[source]
They have shown impressive performance with 6k and 8k ProRes footage, even ipad pros and latest iphones are pretty incredible when it comes to editing 4K video and exporting it faster than latest macbooks. With Thunderbolt it's also pretty easy to extend high performance storage.
replies(1): >>25067339 #
2. p1necone ◴[] No.25067339[source]
I assume there's some clever caching from fast storage + prerendering lower res footage to scrub through?

I was going off normal recommendations for video editing on x86 desktops/laptops. But it makes sense they'd go the extra mile on the software end to make it work on phones.