←back to thread

1080 points antipaul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.486s | source
Show context
faitswulff ◴[] No.25066407[source]
This really flips the argument that Mac hardware is overpriced and underpowered on its head. Now Apple computers are a premium product from a performance perspective, as well.
replies(13): >>25066438 #>>25066460 #>>25066481 #>>25066592 #>>25066593 #>>25066611 #>>25066666 #>>25066717 #>>25066772 #>>25067074 #>>25067563 #>>25068229 #>>25071110 #
chrysoprace ◴[] No.25066481[source]
Does it? The article is comparing Apple products, instead of comparing an Apple product to an equivalent performer from a competitor.

It's not really Apples to Apples (even if it is in name), so to speak.

replies(1): >>25066500 #
1. jaykru ◴[] No.25066500[source]
It's comparing Apple Silicon to Intel silicon (in an Apple product), which is apples to oranges to me.
replies(1): >>25066565 #