←back to thread

1080 points antipaul | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
WoodenChair ◴[] No.25065476[source]
Their line from the video about being the highest performance chip in single core appears to be true. This is of course a synthetic benchmark but the single core result is very promising. Note that the single core and multi core scores exceed the top-of-the-line 16” MacBook Pro (9th generation 8-core i9 2.4 ghz). I actually made the call to sell my 16” for the new Air yesterday. It’s looking like a good call. Glad I’m selling my 16” while it still has some value.

You can see all Air results so far here: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?q=MacBookAir10%2...

replies(8): >>25065492 #>>25065503 #>>25065568 #>>25065571 #>>25065783 #>>25066300 #>>25066486 #>>25069168 #
sneak ◴[] No.25066300[source]
I bought the new Air, but I’m keeping my 16” as it may be the last laptop of that quality that can run programs without telling some stranger over the network that you’ve run a specific program.

Current (and presumably future) macOS does this and you can’t turn it off, except with Little Snitch. New APIs in macOS 11 means that Little Snitch will no longer be able to block OS processes, so it will require external network filtering hardware.

I’ll likely end up with Linux on the 16”, and use the new one for things that are not secret/private.

replies(1): >>25066437 #
1. claudeganon ◴[] No.25066437[source]
This is where I’m at too. Compromising Little Snitch and VPNs is just a bridge too far. It’s cool that they got this level of performance in a lightweight form factor, less so when it enables the worse of surveillance practices.
replies(1): >>25066509 #
2. sneak ◴[] No.25066509[source]
Ugh, I didn’t realize that the system apps would bypass VPNs, too. That’s terrible. :(

https://appleterm.com/2020/10/20/macos-big-sur-firewalls-and...

Looks like it will be impossible to use Apple Silicon (without external network hardware) without revealing your track log to the CIA. How cool is that?!

replies(1): >>25068201 #
3. derbOac ◴[] No.25068201[source]
I'd like to see a good piece on these new Mac systems from the perspective of exactly what they mean in terms of software lockdown.
replies(1): >>25068265 #
4. sneak ◴[] No.25068265{3}[source]
Mine should be here in a week or two, and doubtless I’ll be complaining on my blog with receipts. I can’t promise “good” but I’ll present the facts.