←back to thread

1080 points antipaul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nostromo ◴[] No.25065960[source]
So... I'd be feeling pretty silly right now if I bought the Mac Pro in 2019 for like $7,000. (Which I almost did!)

https://browser.geekbench.com/macs/457

M1 is comparable to baseline Mac Pro on multicore performance and better on single core performance. And several thousand dollars cheaper (and smaller).

replies(2): >>25065976 #>>25066071 #
kube-system ◴[] No.25065976[source]
There's still a lot to be said for software support, IO, RAM, etc.
replies(2): >>25066014 #>>25066178 #
musicale ◴[] No.25066014[source]
Yeah, the Mac Pro supports up to 1.5TB of DRAM (vs. 16GB), it's got a bunch of slots and discrete GPUs, and it can run Windows and Windows VMs. I hope it doesn't end up as an orphan system like the 2013 "trash can" Mac Pro, which was an interesting system that got zero upgrades. Perhaps Apple will offer Apple Silicon upgrades to Mac Pro buyers.

Assuming they can build it (and they have implied that they can scale their silicon designs up in terms of cores, power, and clock rate), an Apple Silicon Mac Pro will be a pretty interesting machine.

If they wanted to, Apple could even bring back an Apple Silicon powered Xserve, or the legendary, mythical, modular desktop Mac (I know, now we're in the realm of pure fantasy, but one can dream.)

replies(1): >>25066093 #
kube-system ◴[] No.25066093[source]
> Apple could even bring back an Apple Silicon powered Xserve

Given their performance/watt, this sounds like it could be potentially game changing.

replies(3): >>25066277 #>>25066533 #>>25066843 #
1. joshspankit ◴[] No.25066277{3}[source]
I don’t know if the wider audiences would invest heavily enough in servers given Apple’s graveyard of products in that space.