←back to thread

1080 points antipaul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
WoodenChair ◴[] No.25065476[source]
Their line from the video about being the highest performance chip in single core appears to be true. This is of course a synthetic benchmark but the single core result is very promising. Note that the single core and multi core scores exceed the top-of-the-line 16” MacBook Pro (9th generation 8-core i9 2.4 ghz). I actually made the call to sell my 16” for the new Air yesterday. It’s looking like a good call. Glad I’m selling my 16” while it still has some value.

You can see all Air results so far here: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?q=MacBookAir10%2...

replies(8): >>25065492 #>>25065503 #>>25065568 #>>25065571 #>>25065783 #>>25066300 #>>25066486 #>>25069168 #
S_A_P ◴[] No.25065571[source]
Damnit I have to decide the same thing. I’m really happy with my 16” mbp for once and I’m not sure if I want to get a smaller screen and give up windows support (for now) I feel like Ms could be convinced to make a version for Apple silicone if it keeps its performance advantage.
replies(1): >>25065590 #
minxomat ◴[] No.25065590[source]
Good news is Parallels announced a closer colab with Apple to bring x86 virt to M1, too. They demo'd Parallels running a linux VM at WWDC, but the upcoming release will also support seamless Windows virt again.
replies(1): >>25065599 #
LeoPanthera ◴[] No.25065599[source]
That demo shows an ARM VM with Linux for ARM running inside it. There have been no announcements or demos of Intel emulation, besides Rosetta 2.
replies(1): >>25065625 #
minxomat ◴[] No.25065625[source]
Parallels announced a full version of Parallels Desktop (which is the Win-on-macOS product) at the same time as the event on Nov 10: https://www.parallels.com/blogs/parallels-desktop-apple-sili...
replies(2): >>25065854 #>>25065874 #
LeoPanthera ◴[] No.25065854{3}[source]
That PR doesn't actually say anything about running Windows. You can't just port the app. A VM on an ARM system is still ARM inside, and given that the PR specifically mentions "support of x64 applications in Windows on ARM", this is clearly for ARM VMs. You'd need actual Intel emulation in order to run the normal version of Windows.
replies(2): >>25065919 #>>25066257 #
1. joshspankit ◴[] No.25066257{4}[source]
You can emulate anything on anything (pretty much), but the real question is can you emulate it at a speed that’s sufficient. That takes host-system-specific optimizations.

Look at N64 emulation, for example.