←back to thread

292 points kaboro | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.803s | source
Show context
x87678r ◴[] No.25058513[source]
Its difficult to think different if you're the world's largest company and dominate the phone market. In laptops it looks like they are differentiating themselves very well.
replies(2): >>25058562 #>>25058912 #
cpuguy83 ◴[] No.25058562[source]
Apple has a small piece of the smartphone pie. That said, their CPU's are consistently in a class of their own.
replies(6): >>25058597 #>>25058604 #>>25058611 #>>25058804 #>>25059094 #>>25059273 #
qzw ◴[] No.25058611[source]
Small in units shipped, but dominant in design, aesthetics, and, most importantly, profit margin.
replies(1): >>25058696 #
oblio ◴[] No.25058696[source]
> but dominant in design

Debatable. If anything, modern Android designs are cleaner than iPhone looks.

> aesthetics

Again, debatable.

> and, most importantly, profit margin

This is the key factor, and it's tied to something you missed.

Apple products and iPhones are ahead in profit margins because Apple consistently delivers reasonable quality goods, with few disappointments, so that users trust them. They've gained user trust despite obvious "design, aesthetics" mis-steps such as the notch or the touch bar.

The key words are: consistent delivery, reasonable quality and few disappointments. That's how they hook users in. Apple mostly delivers on time something very close to what they promised and that thing doesn't have catastrophic flaws. That's a much taller bar than you'd think, in the tech sector.

replies(4): >>25058884 #>>25058988 #>>25059822 #>>25069432 #
1. qzw ◴[] No.25058988[source]
For any other company, the notch probably would've been viewed as a design misstep. For Apple, it became a distinctive feature that was actively imitated by phones that didn't even need to have such a large cutout. That's what it means to be dominant in design and aesthetics.
replies(2): >>25059384 #>>25059478 #
2. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.25059384[source]
> the notch probably would've been viewed as a design misstep

Why? The alternatives are a smaller screen or terrible audio when using one’s phone as a phone. It’s different. But it makes perfect sense and made perfect sense the first day.

replies(1): >>25066733 #
3. jayd16 ◴[] No.25059478[source]
They weren't the first. Sharp and Andy Rubin's Essential Phone had that terrible design first.

OEMs come up with something and the designs echo through the industry.

4. photojosh ◴[] No.25066733[source]
There is only one problem with the notch IMHO... and it's a software issue: taking video fullscreen in the horizontal orientation should only have ever filled the rectangular area.

Otherwise, it's great: the status indicators you want anyway go up in the corners and don't take out a full row of the "actual" screen.