←back to thread

292 points kaboro | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.968s | source | bottom
Show context
burlesona ◴[] No.25058399[source]
The point about robust collaborative editing as an API is interesting. The HN crowd generally prefers native apps and gets tired of the electron parade, but for major business software it’s increasingly table stakes that another person can see what you’re working on, live, by clicking a link.

Apple does have relatively good live collaboration in its iWork apps. Perhaps there’s a future API there?

replies(3): >>25058490 #>>25058830 #>>25058904 #
1. rmorey ◴[] No.25058490[source]
> Apple does have relatively good live collaboration in its iWork apps

Does it? As much as i like the iWork apps, my experience (and impression of the general sentiment) has shown that Google Docs et al continues to blow the pants off iWork in that regard

replies(3): >>25058706 #>>25058822 #>>25059010 #
2. yalogin ◴[] No.25058706[source]
Can you give me some examples where Apple's collaboration SW falls short?
3. burlesona ◴[] No.25058822[source]
I did say "relatively good" :)

I would agree that collaboration is a little smoother in G Suite, however in my experience this is mostly about ease of sharing. Once you've gotten another Apple user to understand that they can "receive a shared document from you" and work on it, then usually collaboration itself is smooth.

4. chrisfinazzo ◴[] No.25059010[source]
The collaborative editing (which I first recall seeing in Google Wave) was essentially carried into Google Docs.

N.B, "SubEthaEdit had this for years!" - I know.

As a whole, it could be argued that where Wave failed, Slack - and predecessors like Basecamp - succeeded.

iWork has always seemed like it has a different user in mind with its collaborative features and never really had much traction in the market, which is already served by offerings whose entire reason for being is collaboration, not just as a general productivity suite.

replies(1): >>25060656 #
5. reaperducer ◴[] No.25060656[source]
N.B, "SubEthaEdit had this for years!" - I know.

FWIW, I first saw collaborative editing over a network done on an Amiga. So I guess this has been a thing for "decades."

replies(1): >>25124103 #
6. chrisfinazzo ◴[] No.25124103{3}[source]
If I'm reading the specs correctly, there was 10 Mb Ethernet capability on the Amiga...in 1985.

Mind blown.

(I was born in '86, albeit late in the year, so I find this especially hilarious.)