←back to thread

DigitalOcean App Platform

(pages.news.digitalocean.com)
646 points digianarchist | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.579s | source
Show context
user5994461 ◴[] No.24700185[source]
I am so glad to see this. I was looking to deploy an app and the choice is either Heroku or manage your own server which I don't want to do.

Heroku gives instant deployment for the most common types of apps (python/java/ruby). It's PaaS done right, it's fantastic. You should really have a look if you're not aware of it, it's only $7 for a starter app.

Problem is, scaling up is about $50 per gigabyte of memory which makes it a dead end for anything non trivial. You're forced to go to digital ocean / Linode / OVH instead to have something affordable.

That leaves Digital Ocean as the only alternative (don't trust Linode) and it sucks because it only gives me a server to manage. I don't want to manage a server I want to run a (python) application. It's 2020 this sort of things should auto deploy from GitHub without bothering me to manage an operating system.

replies(19): >>24700693 #>>24700794 #>>24701039 #>>24702228 #>>24702633 #>>24702880 #>>24703398 #>>24703543 #>>24703620 #>>24704410 #>>24704873 #>>24705031 #>>24705668 #>>24706188 #>>24706382 #>>24707003 #>>24709134 #>>24716137 #>>24727185 #
emilsedgh ◴[] No.24703543[source]
This is spot on, except for one thing: Google Cloud Run.

It's the closest offering I've found to Heroku and am planning to migrate all our services to it due to significantly better pricing. Make sure you look into it.

replies(4): >>24704841 #>>24705131 #>>24705555 #>>24705865 #
Larrikin ◴[] No.24705131[source]
The Google part of the name means that the service could be shut down at moment's notice if it isn't providing millions of dollars in revenue and even then it's a toss up if the people in charge get bored of it.
replies(3): >>24705192 #>>24705306 #>>24707143 #
google234123 ◴[] No.24705192[source]
What Google Cloud product has been shutdown prematurely? You still mad about the Google RSS reader?
replies(3): >>24705201 #>>24705509 #>>24705652 #
1. karlp ◴[] No.24705509[source]
First one I found: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Cloud_Print
replies(1): >>24705592 #
2. manigandham ◴[] No.24705592[source]
That was never a part of Google Cloud. It was a feature of Chrome browser/OS and allowed for sharing printers over the internet because of the limitations back in 2010.

Google has a terrible reputation with consumer services but has been pretty decent with Google Cloud so far. The biggest negative example would be Google Maps pricing changes but that seems to be different class of issue.