←back to thread

367 points lemonberry | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
ChrisMarshallNY ◴[] No.24641703[source]
I love her description of using a dependency-laden component:

> Using a custom element from the directory often needs to be preceded by a ritual of npm flugelhorn, import clownshoes, build quux, all completely unapologetically because “here is my truckload of dependencies, yeah, what”. Many steps are even omitted, likely because they are “obvious”. Often, you wade through the maze only to find the component doesn’t work anymore, or is not fit for your purpose.

That is so true. The "unapologetically" thing is important. I see this all the time. There's often a fair bit of 'tude, where I am looked at with condescension, for not knowing something "obvious."

The fig tree pic is perfect.

EDIT: Removed phrase that was possibly corrosive to the narrative.

replies(7): >>24641798 #>>24641833 #>>24641876 #>>24642200 #>>24642654 #>>24644698 #>>24651062 #
systemvoltage ◴[] No.24642200[source]
> BTW: This lady has a Masters from MIT. She def knows her way around things.

I agree with all of what you said until you bought up this unnecessary credential wrapper. It leaves a bad taste - statements like this. I don't know why. Going to MIT is doesn't make you an automatic genius nor does it mean that they know their way around things. It bothers me.

replies(4): >>24642206 #>>24644873 #>>24659135 #>>24665136 #
1. hackerfromthefu ◴[] No.24659135[source]
Contrasting anecdote - the credential signalling was useful to provide context, else on JS topics it's rational to assume there is a fair to middling chance the writer really doesn't have a grasp of the wider industry body of knowledge, which quite evidently is fairly common for JS topic writers.

I value the additional factual information over removing useful information to try and avoid upsetting anyone at all. I wish more people realised how much real value is lost when everything is filtered.