←back to thread

756 points mtlynch | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.653s | source
Show context
vidanay ◴[] No.23927993[source]
I'm all in favor of cool projects, and I have done my fair share of useless experiments. But wouldn't it just be simpler to attach a dumpster-sourced monitor and keyboard to the server in question for the 3-4 times a year you brick it? To me the idea of a locally placed 1:1 KVM "switch" (huh? it's not switching anything if it's 1:1) is crazy. It makes sense if it is remotely located, but not if it's within your own home.
replies(6): >>23928025 #>>23928089 #>>23928101 #>>23928121 #>>23928126 #>>23928130 #
1. detaro ◴[] No.23928130[source]
not sure why you talk about "switch"? The word never appears in the article?

And at such a no-brainer price (especially if you already have a Pi), kind of worth it just to avoid the hassle of moving a screen around.

replies(1): >>23928184 #
2. vidanay ◴[] No.23928184[source]
https://mtlynch.io/tinypilot/raritan-kvm.png
replies(1): >>23928476 #
3. mtlynch ◴[] No.23928476[source]
I think the confusion is that the original comment was worded as if I called TinyPilot a switch, but I think you're actually saying you think it's strange that Raritan calls their device a switch, despite the fact that it's only 1-port.