←back to thread

Riot is now Element

(element.io)
550 points J_tt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.248s | source
Show context
badrabbit ◴[] No.23843202[source]
No!!! Of all the names in the world why this. "Hey bro, let's chat on Element" ,not quite a ring to it.

The hardest problem in computer science strikes again!

Matrix,Riot and Libolm are epic projects, I wish them all the success but man, even Riot was a hard sell as a brand. I would seriously be dissapointed if it loses popularity over this. I don't think the project maintainers understand that their core users/fans are waiting for a product they can sell to friends,family and coworkers.

People who don't know tech rely on branding/brand reputation and word of mouth reputation to decide if they are intetested in even trying out a product to begin with.

Which of these is unlike the others?

1) Signal

2) Telegram

3) Element

4) Whatsapp

Hint: The theme is messaging and communication.

replies(23): >>23843237 #>>23843275 #>>23843279 #>>23843307 #>>23843441 #>>23843534 #>>23843568 #>>23843577 #>>23843744 #>>23843874 #>>23843920 #>>23843923 #>>23844147 #>>23844323 #>>23844327 #>>23845596 #>>23847596 #>>23847764 #>>23847933 #>>23854492 #>>23854968 #>>23863522 #>>23877413 #
teekert ◴[] No.23843237[source]
Tbh, I don't see any problems with the name? I like it.
replies(4): >>23843285 #>>23843292 #>>23843367 #>>23843709 #
bartread ◴[] No.23843285[source]
Try googling "element", and then try googling "whatsapp". See the difference?

I get frustrated when brands, products, and even more so OSS software projects, choose names that have too many other meanings/brands associated with them because it can make it unnecessarily difficult to find relevant information using current search engine technology[0]. I've had situations where I've been clicking through pages and pages of results to find something relevant to what I'm looking for, even with more qualified searches.

You can critique WhatsApp for any number of reasons, if you're so inclined, but it's hard to argue that they didn't pick a good name. It's eminently searchable and doesn't spam results pages for unrelated/tangentially related topics.

[0] I find names like "Signal" irritating for the opposite reason. You're searching for information about the other meanings and yet much of what you get is brand "spam" results related to the messaging system. Great if that's what you're searching for, not if it isn't.

replies(3): >>23843483 #>>23843939 #>>23844949 #
IshKebab ◴[] No.23843483[source]
> See the difference?

Well obviously it doesn't come up because they only just changed the name! In general Google is pretty good at returning the correct result for ambiguous searches. E.g. try searching for "Signal". Every result is about the signal app for me.

replies(2): >>23843508 #>>23844190 #
1. squarefoot ◴[] No.23844190[source]
Google is generally good at returning correct results because they analyzed all users habits and can infer what one is looking for; it's up to the user to choose if it's worth the price to pay wrt privacy. As for Signal, it's pretty normal for search engines, whether they spy on users or not, to return the app, since in their algorithms an explicit name (Signal) always wins over a generic name (a signal), which imo is how a search engine should work. In due time, most searches for Element will eventually return the chat app. I'm not sure I will like the name by then though.