←back to thread

293 points doener | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.524s | source
Show context
jaekash ◴[] No.23831635[source]
And we already know China has been backdooring other equipment: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-h...

So yes, this is a small victory in a massive war.

replies(4): >>23831669 #>>23831765 #>>23831843 #>>23836607 #
londons_explore ◴[] No.23831765[source]
The cost of that victory, according to the BBC, is a 1 year delay in the rollout of 5G tech.

That's a pretty large economic cost. Bob can't watch his medical lectures on the train, so ends up behind in class, Mary's company looses a contract to a foreign competitor because she got frustrated with her bad VPN and didn't read over the bid one last time, Fred couldn't afford the cost of the new 5G contracts so didn't get much data and ended up losing touch with his friends who were all group video calling eachother.

All these socio-economic costs cascade for decades or more. Do they really outweigh the theoretical ability for another nation to disrupt network traffic for a few hours until a mitigation is put in place?

replies(6): >>23831913 #>>23831935 #>>23832206 #>>23832226 #>>23835664 #>>23836021 #
cm2187 ◴[] No.23831935[source]
Not sure if you are being sarcastic, but assuming you aren't. No consumer is asking for 5g, and I don't think any consumer will realise the difference. And not sure that 5g can do much good on a train, unless the train circles around inside a big city and never goes in the countryside where what matters is antenna with long range.
replies(2): >>23832080 #>>23833771 #
1. me_me_me ◴[] No.23833771[source]
But with 5G i can watch Netflix faster /s

5g is just another white rabbit big Multinational are chasing to justify/force infrastructure replacement.

replies(1): >>23833867 #
2. cm2187 ◴[] No.23833867[source]
Or to get 4k video streaming on my tiny smartphone screen, because I'm worth it!