←back to thread

293 points doener | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
gberger ◴[] No.23831049[source]
The justification is that the equipment presents a national security risk.

If that's true, how is it reasonable to allow this equipment to operate in the UK for 7 more years? Doesn't that mean the UK is willingly under national security risk for 7 years?

Unless, of course, there was never a security risk...

replies(8): >>23831063 #>>23831079 #>>23831096 #>>23831098 #>>23831127 #>>23831131 #>>23831440 #>>23831555 #
tomfanning ◴[] No.23831063[source]
Not dissimilar to how face masks are being made compulsory in shops by the British government.

In 11 days' time.

replies(4): >>23831092 #>>23831101 #>>23831104 #>>23831132 #
krona ◴[] No.23831104[source]
You're assuming everyone who must to go to a shop in the next 11 days already have in their possession an appropriate face covering; the definition of which is as yet unknown.
replies(2): >>23831149 #>>23831188 #
1. blhack ◴[] No.23831188[source]
If the face masks are that essential (which they probably are): wrap a t shirt around your face.