←back to thread

293 points doener | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
gberger ◴[] No.23831049[source]
The justification is that the equipment presents a national security risk.

If that's true, how is it reasonable to allow this equipment to operate in the UK for 7 more years? Doesn't that mean the UK is willingly under national security risk for 7 years?

Unless, of course, there was never a security risk...

replies(8): >>23831063 #>>23831079 #>>23831096 #>>23831098 #>>23831127 #>>23831131 #>>23831440 #>>23831555 #
1. room271 ◴[] No.23831096[source]
Our governments balance these concerns all the time: economic cost vs security risk. It's very normal.