Maybe these are the """hard questions"""[0] that need to be asked, as opposed to calling for a return to the Jim Crow era.
You could easily "turn off" Twitter.
Maybe these are the """hard questions"""[0] that need to be asked, as opposed to calling for a return to the Jim Crow era.
You could easily "turn off" Twitter.
And here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18426853
And here: https://www.computerworld.com/article/2474708/does-this-mega...
Perhaps if the queen of Hacker News chose to be clear about his beliefs his minions wouldn’t need to scurry to claim "he doesn’t actually believe this"
Yet another reminder of just how creepy the cult of personality HN has around Paul Graham is. Even on an article discussing him, you can't say anything critical without being downvoted and flagged.
if you think you have some real knowledge to drop, make a considered criticism instead of a snide remark.
I’ve known PG’s biases and dogwhistles for a while ("What you can’t say" is a FOGHORN of a dogwhistle), but the political landscape has changed.
When PG is expressing open regret for opening this forum, despite dang doing most of the work, he’s signaling that the discussion of this forum isn’t going in the direction he wants. This has been the most civil forum on the surface web for a long time. And that says a lot.
And in your second link, PG is talked about briefly in the comments halfway down... I'm still not making the connection here