←back to thread

428 points coronadisaster | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
msoad ◴[] No.23679601[source]
Google's developer relations team have done a good job convincing web devs that those APIs are pushed by Google to enable "Amazing PWAs", yet we haven't seen them used by any major app. People are choosing to download native apps for more sophisticated applications.

However Google is pushing those APIs because they know tracking people without cookies in future is a big challenge for them and they need new ways of tracking people.

So sad that Google has taken over the web. From the most used browser (Chrome) to the content hijacking (AMP) to the standards (PWA). All to sell you to advertisers.

replies(6): >>23679828 #>>23679848 #>>23680171 #>>23680533 #>>23681627 #>>23684654 #
Abishek_Muthian ◴[] No.23680171[source]
If PWAs die, we will be struck with this duopoly in smartphone OS for foreseeable future as native apps are the ones which help them retain their position.

If we want upcoming pure Linux smartphone OS, Sailfish or any other platform which protect the mobile computing from becoming proprietary; we need web apps & PWAs to grow and capture significant market.

Apple's treatment towards PWAs has been well known as PWAs are the only threat for its Appstore monopoly in iOS.

replies(4): >>23680351 #>>23680700 #>>23681129 #>>23687251 #
spideymans ◴[] No.23680700[source]
From a developer's point of view, I can see the value in PWAs (for them), but as an end user, I really don't see the benefit of PWAs over native apps. The UX is almost always severely degraded when compared to their native counterparts (even if the feature set is ostensibly identical). Why would I use a Twitter PWA, when the native app provides a much better UX?
replies(9): >>23680899 #>>23681495 #>>23681521 #>>23681562 #>>23681669 #>>23681934 #>>23685628 #>>23685736 #>>23695045 #
the_gipsy ◴[] No.23681669[source]
Why on earth would I use a native app for twitter? It's all static content browsing, this has been solved decades ago with the web.

The occasional tweet I may send is just an input field and a file upload maybe.

replies(3): >>23681798 #>>23686410 #>>23689695 #
Longhanks ◴[] No.23681798[source]
This is a perfect example of a HN reader being out of touch with what the vast majority of users actually want. There are plenty of reasons people want a native twitter app: state restoration, integration with system services, push notifications, better user experience, better accessibility, fewer ways to track the user, better permission model, ...
replies(4): >>23682319 #>>23682546 #>>23683027 #>>23683355 #
asjw ◴[] No.23682546[source]
Vast majority of users go back home and browse on their laptops because a big screen is better than a credit card

Vast majority of users will use whatever you throw at them, especially if they're friction free (no account needed, no credit card, no updates, no space occupied, immediately available, even on slow networks, etc. etc.)

replies(1): >>23686354 #
1. InfiniteRand ◴[] No.23686354[source]
> Vast majority of users go back home and browse on their laptops because a big screen is better than a credit card

I used to think this, because I am like this, but living with my wife made me realize that for a lot of people, the phone is the primary internet device. Probably one factor is that she is a nurse, so she works on her feet. Also, she generally does not have a deep relationship with her machines, computers to her are strictly tools, so laptop is basically for word processing and storing photos when the phone gets full.

Another way to look at it is that it's not that browsing the internet is better for her on the phone, it's that sitting down with a laptop is a disruption in her routine that needs to be justified.