←back to thread

428 points coronadisaster | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
philistine ◴[] No.23677180[source]
I’ve heard so many people complain on HN about Safari’s lack of support for APIs. Before now, we didn’t have a public justification why Apple refused to implement them. Now we know.

The price of a Safari user in the ad market is going down, and it’s exactly what should be happening. I’m very happy with Apple.

https://9to5mac.com/2019/12/09/apple-safari-privacy-feature-...

replies(8): >>23677237 #>>23677240 #>>23677307 #>>23677333 #>>23677632 #>>23678116 #>>23681749 #>>23682896 #
fastball ◴[] No.23677307[source]
Except "privacy" as a justification is BS.

You can implement these APIs while at the same time requiring explicit permission from the user before a web application can use them. This preserves privacy while also giving users the option to have much more powerful web applications.

Apple doesn't want to implement these APIs because currently if you want access to these things on iOS, you need to go through their walled garden App Store, where they get a big chunk of any revenue you might make on such a service and can nerf competitors and all the other anti-competitive stuff they're doing.

replies(7): >>23677413 #>>23677496 #>>23677509 #>>23677610 #>>23679646 #>>23679893 #>>23680797 #
otterley ◴[] No.23679646[source]
Apple has the ability to put every submitted app through rigorous analysis before publication on the App Store to look for forbidden behavior, in order to protect their customers. They don't have that ability with arbitrary websites.
replies(3): >>23681382 #>>23681868 #>>23685033 #
1. searchableguy ◴[] No.23681382[source]
You made the same point before but again, how did tiktok, facebook and all the other crap gets past it? What about all the other chinese spyware?