←back to thread

428 points coronadisaster | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
phkahler ◴[] No.23677378[source]
Those APIs should not exist. Web site creators need to stop acting like they are entitled to access whatever they want on someone's computer.

I dont care about your unique SaS usecase, these are invasive. Make a native app if that's what you need.

replies(3): >>23677439 #>>23677650 #>>23679378 #
azangru ◴[] No.23677650[source]
Why is accessing this via a native app better than accessing it via web browser?
replies(4): >>23677681 #>>23678522 #>>23678723 #>>23680258 #
1. joeblau ◴[] No.23680258[source]
I wouldn't have any problems giving these APIs access via the web, but one challenge with the websites is that I'm never 100% sure that when I "retract" a permission or say "stop tracking me" that it's done. I think that if access to these API's were wrapped in some sort of Privacy API that superseded each website's privacy and data collection polices I would be more comfortable with this. These changes just seem like something Google threw over the wall to get things working with Chrome and every other browser developer said "no thanks".