←back to thread

677 points saeedjabbar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.23544162[source]
Stylistic question. I noticed Black and White capitalized in this article. Is that an emerging convention?
replies(9): >>23544251 #>>23544304 #>>23544318 #>>23544325 #>>23544381 #>>23544512 #>>23544595 #>>23545100 #>>23545176 #
stevenbedrick ◴[] No.23544304[source]
It's a really interesting story, actually! The question of whether and when to capitalize has been an active one since at least the early 20th century. Here's a (very) recent Columbia Journalism Review article that discusses it from a stylistic perspective:

https://www.cjr.org/analysis/capital-b-black-styleguide.php

And I also thought that this article, about the Brookings Institution's decision to capitalize Black in their reports, had some interesting historical context:

https://www.brookings.edu/research/brookingscapitalizesblack...

replies(1): >>23544414 #
neonate ◴[] No.23544414[source]
Capitalizing White seems extremely weird, though, and somehow emblematic of how we're sliding backwards into a racialized consciousness even while trying (and hopefully succeeding) to step forwards toward equality.
replies(1): >>23544567 #
erik_seaberg ◴[] No.23544567[source]
This. The words "white" and "black" are not proper names of places, and they aren't honorifics. To say I'm "White" would be like saying I'm "Fat" or "Tired".
replies(3): >>23544613 #>>23545206 #>>23549729 #
1. neonate ◴[] No.23544613{3}[source]
I'm not sure that argument works grammatically because we capitalize things that aren't names of places, but I agree with you in the sense that it's the feeling I got while reading the article, and it was strangely creepy.