←back to thread

677 points saeedjabbar | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.835s | source
Show context
dang ◴[] No.23543783[source]
This is an interesting and in-depth article that was inappropriately flagged. I've turned off the flags.

I understand the impulse to flag follow-up stories [1], especially on the hottest controversies of the moment, which always produce a flood of articles, most of which aren't very good. Curiosity and repetition don't go together [2]. But it's important to recognize the articles that are higher than median quality and not simply flag an entire category mechanically. Curiosity isn't mechanical either.

[1] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

[2] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

[3] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

replies(5): >>23543916 #>>23543987 #>>23544124 #>>23544566 #>>23545855 #
anewdirection ◴[] No.23543987[source]
I flagged it because it is an article written to promote further bias, while under the guise of 'exposing racism'. If you think promoting race politics is the goal of HN, I will find a different forum. My time in SV could not have been more different than what this boased article proports. Fuck identity politics and fuck bloomberg, and fuck you for promoting this drivel.
replies(3): >>23544098 #>>23544157 #>>23544406 #
1. dang ◴[] No.23544098[source]
This pairs nicely with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23431559.
replies(1): >>23547042 #
2. Aperocky ◴[] No.23547042[source]
Hahaha let the radicals battle it out themselves, bravo.
replies(1): >>23554952 #
3. dang ◴[] No.23554952[source]
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13110004