←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
standardUser ◴[] No.23328914[source]
There seem to be some upside down priorities here. Many folks seem to be arguing that its an unacceptable form of censorship for a private platform to annotate content it allows others to post. Meanwhile, I'm seeing barely a mention of the fact that the President of the United States has threatened to use government power to shut down an entire sector of the economy devoted to communication. The latter is almost certainly a violation of the Constitution. The former, almost certainly not.
replies(5): >>23329641 #>>23330604 #>>23331781 #>>23332920 #>>23333082 #
meragrin_ ◴[] No.23330604[source]
Perhaps they see it as targeting a political figure because of political differences rather than trying to prevent the spread of misinformation. I'm not seeing any annotations on a number prominent members of Congress spreading misinformation.

Where in the US Constitution does it say presidents cannot threaten companies? Obama had his share of threats. I'm sure they could find a suitable legal issue with Twitter targeting Trump while ignoring members of Congress.

replies(4): >>23330822 #>>23330866 #>>23330974 #>>23332915 #
standardUser ◴[] No.23330822[source]
"Obama had his share of threats."

Cite two.

replies(1): >>23331597 #
austingulati ◴[] No.23331597{3}[source]
A quick Google found two:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/07/obama-tax-inve...

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-obama-financials/obama-th...

Not sure this will support the original commenters point, as these "threats" have a basis in reality and appear to be good causes unlike Trump's, but these are "threats" by Obama at least according to the journalists involved.

Edit: why the downvotes? I am showing that the Trump supporter above is full of shit, Obama's "threats" were for good causes

replies(2): >>23332110 #>>23336555 #
1. meragrin_ ◴[] No.23336555{4}[source]
Trump supporter? I cannot wait for Trump to be gone. If I were a Trump supporter, I would refer to him as President or President Trump. More like person who is not triggered just by the mere mention of Trump.

I never even insinuated Obama's threats were not for good causes. Part of being a president is to execute laws and regulations which includes threats of action.

Since I have no doubt someone will take my "President" comment above out of context, I will not refer to a political figure by their former position title. To me, wishing/expecting to be referred by their former position is akin to using it as a title of nobility and expecting to be treated as nobility.