←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
VBprogrammer ◴[] No.23322903[source]
Can this even be considered a free speech issue? They aren't deleting his tweet, only displaying it alongside a fact check. Of course you can try to call into question the impartiality of the fact check but that is a long way from not deciding not to show the content.
replies(6): >>23323205 #>>23327484 #>>23327571 #>>23328045 #>>23329677 #>>23329719 #
m-p-3 ◴[] No.23328045[source]
And if he decided to "close" Twitter, it would actually be a clear case of censorship from the government and a violation of free speech.

Twitter is merely labelling a tweet as being factually incorrect, it's not hiding the content.

replies(4): >>23328387 #>>23329001 #>>23329224 #>>23329390 #
rsynnott ◴[] No.23328387[source]
Well, it wouldn't be, because he _couldn't do it_. He's not a dictator, despite apparent aspirations.
replies(1): >>23328509 #
three_seagrass ◴[] No.23328509[source]
Real question: As the head of the Federal executive branch, who would stop him?
replies(2): >>23328611 #>>23328846 #
dlp211 ◴[] No.23328611[source]
Judges in every district, appeals court, and the SCOTUS. An injunction would be put in place not more than an hour after such a deceleration by the POTUS was made.
replies(3): >>23328810 #>>23329311 #>>23329728 #
1. ◴[] No.23329728[source]