←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.328s | source
Show context
falcolas ◴[] No.23322696[source]
Free speech is not just an American constitutional right; many countries throughout the world consider free speech to be a human right.

So, yeah, many of us get a bit worked up when people are kicked off platforms, because they are being silenced, sometimes to the point of being shut out of the modern internet entirely (when their rights to a DNS address are comprehensively removed).

Hate speech and lies are terrible, but they’re not the only thing being silenced.

replies(5): >>23322837 #>>23322861 #>>23322910 #>>23327959 #>>23329690 #
ianleeclark ◴[] No.23322837[source]
> So, yeah, many of us get a bit worked up when people are kicked off platforms, because they are being silenced, sometimes to the point of being shut out of the modern internet entirely (when their rights to a DNS address are comprehensively removed).

Why is it bad that were refusing to let something like stormfront operate in polite society? Your free speech absolutism is dangerous.

You can't debate an inherently bad-faith interlocutor, so dealing with Nazis points "out in the open," "in the marketplace of ideas," will not work. It will only legitimize their viewpoint as one worthy of consideration, thus debate. It's cool and good what happened to them.

replies(2): >>23323023 #>>23325888 #
AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.23325888[source]
You debate an inherently bad-faith interlocutor, not to win the debate with them, but to win the audience. The thing is, something like stormfront is out there, whether twitter or whoever carries them or not. I'd like their drivel to be clearly exposed as drivel, and clearly understood to be drivel by everyone, so that when they get exposed to it in some unexpected way (they follow an innocent-looking link or whatever), then they take one look, think "Oh yeah, that garbage. Yeah, they make it sound good, but it's still trash." That happens when the stuff is publicly challenged and refuted, not when it's hidden away.
replies(3): >>23328251 #>>23328513 #>>23329407 #
neaden ◴[] No.23328513[source]
Yeah, that's not how it works at all. People who start watching the Qanon videos in their Youtube reccomendations aren't going to then get swayed by your eloquent speech, they are going to get sucked into a whole alternate world where your arguments are just dismissed as part of the conspiracy.
replies(1): >>23328794 #
AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.23328794[source]
My point was that they should be exposed to why this stuff is garbage before they start watching Qanon, so that, when they stumble onto a Qanon video, they aren't swayed by the video's eloquent(?) speech or dazzling(?) logic.
replies(2): >>23329258 #>>23329544 #
1. neaden ◴[] No.23329258[source]
How do you do that though? If someone doesn't know what QAnon is why would they watch a video debunking it? If you have mass media doing take downs of it that will just inspire a certain segment of the population to believe it because "Look how THEY don't want you to know this!" The sad thing is that tech, especially Youtube and Facebook, have through their algorithms promoted these conspiracy theories since QAnon conspiracy theorist watch a lot of videos and comment a lot which are the metrics they promote.