←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.343s | source
1. padseeker ◴[] No.23329146[source]
Am I the only one that sees the irony that

A) Twitter, a private company, was merely adding a warning to his tweet which doesn't restrict his speech at all, and has long been defended by conservatives that private companies restricting speech is not a violation of the first amendment

AND

B) Trump threatened to use the powers of government to stop someone from violating his speech that is not protected by the first amendment is ACTUALLY VIOLATING THE FIRST AMENDMENT?