←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
swebs ◴[] No.23322365[source]
Good, I hope this forces them to decide whether to be neutral platforms or publishers. They've been having their cake and eating it too for far too long.
replies(2): >>23322936 #>>23323239 #
shadowgovt ◴[] No.23322936[source]
I hope they take Trump head-on, and declare an affirmative right to freedom of the press that does not violate safe-harbor policy.
replies(1): >>23327786 #
anewdirection ◴[] No.23327786[source]
Why? Thats the whole problem.
replies(1): >>23328271 #
1. shadowgovt ◴[] No.23328271[source]
The problem is that sites (that users can choose to use or refrain from using) have a right to freedom of the press and protection against libel / slander lawsuits for also re-hosting information that third parties post through them?

I don't think that's a problem. Sounds like working-as-intended.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/21/18700605/section-230-inte...