←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
djohnston ◴[] No.23322847[source]
The head of integrity has unabashedly showcased his strong political bias on Twitter, and I suspect things will begin going poorly for either him or Twitter shortly.
replies(6): >>23322949 #>>23322950 #>>23322971 #>>23323003 #>>23323336 #>>23323566 #
josefresco ◴[] No.23323003[source]
Turns out, people with important jobs that require impartiality (like judges) have real, personal, opinions and feelings.
replies(3): >>23323036 #>>23323065 #>>23324906 #
palsir ◴[] No.23323036[source]
but judges are publicly accountable, while corporations (and their agents) can do what they want. Comes back down to the publisher/curator debate.
replies(1): >>23323051 #
gonzo41 ◴[] No.23323051[source]
You can hold private companies accountable via secondary boycott. It's more complicated but it can be done.
replies(2): >>23327631 #>>23327671 #
1. anewdirection ◴[] No.23327631{3}[source]
'Are held' and 'can be done' are obscenely different to conflate them.