←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
rlyshw ◴[] No.23322810[source]
Honestly just more proof that we need decentralization of the Internet. Handing over control of our digital platforms and identities to 3rd party for-profit companies is not the way the internet should work.
replies(2): >>23322901 #>>23322935 #
bt1a ◴[] No.23322901[source]
Aye but with no one in charge, how can the masses protect themselves against ever-increasing disinformation campaigns?
replies(7): >>23323120 #>>23323161 #>>23323220 #>>23323279 #>>23323310 #>>23324872 #>>23333226 #
1. polytely ◴[] No.23324872[source]
Well in the case of mastodon, I found an instance with an owner whose judgement I trust.

I think the main problem with twitter is scale: Because the network allows you to reach the whole world it also is a big target for disinformation networks and the sheer volume of posts makes it uneconomical to moderate.

If you look at mastodon, the instance I'm on has about 600 monthly active users. That's pretty easy for an admin to handle. If a bunch of users show up orchestrating a disinfo campaign the admin would notice, and if an instance is a source of disinfo it can be blocked.

Instance will stop federating with other instances if they are too much to deal with, so admins are incentivized not to grow beyond what they could moderate, to maintain access to the fediverse.