←back to thread

707 points patd | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.518s | source
Show context
Communitivity ◴[] No.23323569[source]
Good luck with that (not). Today we have decentralized social networks specifically designed to combat that kind of censorship, and other problems with centralized control.

For videos, see https://joinpeertube.org or https://libry.tv

For micro-blogging, see https://joinmastodon.org

For photos, see https://pixelfed.org

For others, see https://fediverse.party/

replies(2): >>23323862 #>>23324418 #
1. jmull ◴[] No.23324418[source]
Adding a link to a factual counter-argument is not censorship. Even adding a link to a non-factual, non-sensical rant is not censorship.

You're actually suggesting that posting dissenting information is censorship?!?

Black is white! Good is bad!

replies(1): >>23339390 #
2. Communitivity ◴[] No.23339390[source]
No, I am suggesting that closing down Twitter because they ban content that is harassing, that is censorship.