I absolutely want to agree with you, but we’ve already seen controversial fact checkers ranging from, politifact, Snopes, mediamatters, Hillary Clinton‘s campaign, and in this instance Twitter’s own employee with his own colorful statements.
The issue becomes with what fact checkers omit, who’s statements are scrutinized and whose are the ignored as “jokes”, what part of a statement they choose to focus on, or any sort of perspective at all. If you’re an adult you know that life is shades of gray.
Was Biden being racist when he said “you ain’t black” if Blacks don’t vote for him? How would a fact checker properly handle this?
“Fact checking“ even with the best intentions, is it game I don’t think we want to play.
> Interesting to see public information warefare playing out in real time.
Agreed