←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
qubex ◴[] No.23322492[source]
I’m an outsider (not American, don’t live in America) so I’m almost not entitled to have an opinion on the matter, but it always strikes me as fairly odd when people of one persuasion or another rail against the ‘bias’ that they perceive against them in one circumstance or another (including media coverage).

Of course people see bias against them. It’s classical confirmation bias: every time something goes their way, it’s unremarkable, but as soon as something doesn’t, it’s noticeable.

Isn’t it equally possible —nay, probable even, especially in this case— that the perceived bias is only the prevailing opinion of the majority against whom one is in a minority?

replies(4): >>23322528 #>>23322672 #>>23325794 #>>23328477 #
2019-nCoV[dead post] ◴[] No.23322528[source]
He's the only one being fact checked. And they chose CNN (most antithetical news source) to "debunk" his claims.

https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384

qubex ◴[] No.23322594[source]
You mean ‘unethical’? ‘Antithetical’ means “opposed to”.
replies(1): >>23322607 #
thebouv ◴[] No.23322607[source]
It was a bigly word choice.
replies(2): >>23322915 #>>23322969 #
2019-nCoV[dead post] ◴[] No.23322969{4}[source]
Redheads really are rampant with insecurity aren't they.
1. palsir ◴[] No.23323224{5}[source]
are you an AI? Your dev should check out GPT-2, it's much more coherent than the current model.