←back to thread

MacOS Catalina: Slow by Design?

(sigpipe.macromates.com)
2031 points jrk | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.428s | source
Show context
kar1181 ◴[] No.23273511[source]
I completely understand why things are going the way they are as our computing environment has become ever more hostile. But I am very nostalgic for the time where I would power up a Vic-20 and within seconds be able to get to work.

Teaching my daughter to program on a modern computer, we spend more time bootstrapping and in process, than we do in actual development.

replies(9): >>23273634 #>>23273690 #>>23274401 #>>23275661 #>>23275696 #>>23275797 #>>23276214 #>>23276237 #>>23276540 #
tragomaskhalos ◴[] No.23273690[source]
That computers are just slower to interact with now is such a truism that we hardly remark upon it any more. It seems utterly insane that in the early 90's I could just run Windows 3.1 on a bit of kit that in all likelihood wouldn't even power a toaster today, and the experience was, well, frictionless. I don't recall ever thinking "wtf is this thing doing?", whereas today, by contrast, if I have the audacity to be afk for long enough for my Windows 10 box to go sleep I know I am in for an infuriating waste of minutes' worth of disk thrashing before the bloody thing even deigns to reacknowledge my existence.
replies(8): >>23273841 #>>23273857 #>>23273897 #>>23273933 #>>23273946 #>>23274122 #>>23274148 #>>23275025 #
Domenic_S ◴[] No.23274148[source]
> Windows 10 box to go sleep I know I am in for an infuriating waste of minutes' worth of disk thrashing before the bloody thing even deigns to reacknowledge my existence.

Yeah, what the heck is this? I use a win10 box solely for gaming, and every single time I wake from sleep, Antimalware Executable keeps my machine from doing anything for several minutes. It's infuriating.

replies(2): >>23274653 #>>23275224 #
1. Spooky23 ◴[] No.23275224[source]
Silly user. The computer exists to update itself. Whatever trivial task you want to do is a secondary concern.
replies(1): >>23275784 #
2. saagarjha ◴[] No.23275784[source]
You joke, but there is a surprising amount of software that does not have its user as the primary thing it cares about.