> letting students take the test again.
Yeah, that still fits "our system broke, you're screwed now, sorry".
They have the submissions, the submissions can be easily converted to their target format. That's what they should do instead of asking students to take the test again.
Or maybe they simply delete any accepted[1] submission that they deem corrupted, in which case I have nothing more to say.
[1] Quote:
> Spencer used the same process on the real exam and thought it went through, but he received an email the next day saying the files were corrupted and that he needed to retake the test.