←back to thread

669 points danso | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.548s | source
1. irrational ◴[] No.23262863[source]
The thing I don't understand in all the news articles I have read about this is the major complaint of the students seems to be that they have to retake the test which will mean they have to study for a few more weeks. Isn't having more time to study a good thing? Having more time to study and prepare should mean less stress, not more.
replies(3): >>23262891 #>>23262992 #>>23263047 #
2. Spivak ◴[] No.23262891[source]
Double edged sword I suppose. If you felt you did poorly you now have another chance to do well. But if you felt like you did well then you'll probably get a lower score.
3. karthikshan ◴[] No.23262992[source]
If they didn't have to retake the test they would have 0 stress because they'd be done, so you can't really claim there's less stress. Also many students likely already crammed enough knowledge into their heads for when they took the original test, and are now forced to retain all of this for multiple weeks, i.e they have to put in a lot more effort studying for little to no improvement in score (yes students cram for tests and don't retain information, that's just how testing works)
4. chadlavi ◴[] No.23263047[source]
It also means you need to go through the traumatic and stressful experience of taking the test again, when you thought you were already past it.